Multilateral Solutions to the Erosion of Non-Reciprocal Preferences in NAMA

Published By: WTO | Published Date: October, 01 , 2005

This paper analyzes the risks of preference erosion arising from MFN trade liberalization in manufactured products. It focuses on developing countries that receive non-reciprocal preferences in the markets of United States, EU, Japan, Canada and Australia. The paper estimates preference margins as the difference between non-reciprocal preferential rates received by individual countries and the best available (MFN or better-than-MFN) treatment received on average by all other suppliers. Most previous work on this subject has compared the preferential rates for individual countries with MFN rates alone, which the paper found to have the effect of over-stating the margin at risk from erosion following MFN reductions.The paper finds that developing countries as a whole do not loose from preference erosion following MFN liberalization, although significant gains and losses underlie the estimate of the average. Almost all least-developed countries either lose from preference erosion or are unaffected by it because their exports are already largely MFN duty-free.

Author(s): Roberta Piermartini, Patrick Low, Jurgen Richtering | Posted on: Dec 19, 2005 | Views(2478) | Download (948)


Member comments

Submit

No Comments yet! Be first one to initiate it!

Creative Commons License